Is Atheism a “Movement?”

I often am conflicted about the subtitle of this blog, “The Atheist Movement in America.” Can a lack of belief in a thing really be considered a movement? And does the word “movement” make atheism seem like a trend or a fad that has risen and will fall again in popularity?

movement

In short, no, atheism is not a movement. In a perfect world, it doesn’t need to be described as such, because it describes a non-belief. We don’t need to create a “movement” to promote the idea that unicorns don’t exist. However, people who do not believe in unicorns are not persecuted for their beliefs. They aren’t fired for believing in unicorns, compared to history’s mass murderers, called immoral, etc. It’s clear to see that this religious country in which we live has a problem with atheists. Atheism has existed since before religious texts were written and will exist long after I am dead. So can I really describe atheism this way? I fear that the word “movement” belittles the cause a bit.

What is “the cause?”

This is a question asked to me by a friend when I told him I was afraid Christopher Hitchens’ beligirent manner and incendiary book titles are going to “mess up the cause.”

My answer to him was similar to the description above. America has a problem seeing that atheists are normal people, capable of possessing morals and values, contributing to society, having loving families and showing compassion. An atheist can possess all the positive values that a person of faith can. Many Americans do not realize this. And well spoken atheists that have spoken out recently like Richard Dawkins and Sam Harris helped Americans to see that atheists are not all black-fingernail-polish-wearing, hot-topic-shopping, pentagram-wearing baby eaters. In fact, I’d hope that very few are. The more that these authors speak clearly and present their points, the more Americans will understand and be comfortable with atheists. That is “the cause” — to help Americans recognize atheists as normal and productive members of society.

There is a chain reaction effect. When a well-spoken person is on CNN talking about atheism and appears to be normal and treated normally, then more atheists won’t have a problem with telling people about their feelings about religion. The more atheists that come out of the closet, the more accepting those of faith will be.

So this brings me back to the word “movement.” Is atheism a “movement?” It has to be. There has to be some sort of organization to the rise in acceptance of atheism, especially in the wake of the religious/political ties of the last decade. Fellow atheist blogger, Vjack wrote about this topic recently on his blog, The Atheist Revolution:

Without improved organization, we atheists, secular humanists, and/or freethinkers are never going to have much of a voice. Unless we can find common ground, even if it consists of temporary alliances focused on particular issues, we are doomed to be barely audible voices of reason in a sea of superstition and irrationality. A noble position? Perhaps, but I tend to be more concerned with results than appearances.

What we need is a grassroots freethought organization along the lines of MoveOn.org. Regardless of what you think of their politics, you have to admire the influence they have come to have. Picture an internet-based alliance of atheists, agnostics, secular humanists, and freethinkers where the members would have a voice in setting the goals of the organization and where the organization would use websites, e-mail, text messages, etc. to mobilize members to make our voices heard.

With that I urge you — normal, everyday good-citizen, moral-possessing atheists — to not be afraid to discuss your atheism with those of faith. Be prepared to speak calmly and rationally and let them know you have many of the same concerns they do. The more Americans that see atheists as normal, the less we’ll need an “atheist movement.”

Digg this Story

About these ads

10 Responses to Is Atheism a “Movement?”

  1. Sojourner says:

    I’m sorry to have to re-make a point that has been made by others far more eloquent than I. Surely, however, an undue concern for the social comfort of the religious is what brought us to this sorry pass in the first place? Had we not all been so timid and so respectful of the right of people who believe in fables (consider how ridiculous this position is in the context of university teaching!), enough people would have been emboldened by the imperatives of intellectual honesty to nip emergent religious fundamentalisms in the bud. However, we’ve all been speaking softly and leaving our big stick at home, with the result that we are now deafened by the shouts of others, and bleeding from the attacks of the religiously righteous and violent. I think we owe the religious about the same respect we would proffer to those who believe that sleeping with young girls who are virgins cures AIDS (yes, there are many such, I do assure you): a determined opposition motivated by horror for the plight of their victims. I truly cannot believe that the right of the religious to “feel good/respected/heard” trumps the rights of others not to be indoctrinated, or oppressed, or married off, or sent to Jesus camp, or bombed, or mutilated or killed.

  2. Letter to a New Atheist

    You who have been cursed with a religious upbringing which you are now questioning, this letter is for you. You who are starting to doubt whether an ancient text really offers you much worthwhile guidance about how to live your life today, this lette…

  3. […] are a wonderful bunch, but there is nothing that you could call a recognizable atheist community in the sense that might be familiar to ex-Christians. However, many of us are doing what we can to […]

  4. Atheism: Becoming a Movement

    Earlier this month, The Great Realization did a very thought-provoking post called “Is Atheism a “Movement?” I’ve been thinking about it ever since and have already linked to it in a previous post. However, I now feel the need to come back and addr…

  5. Michael Dixon says:

    I agree that atheists need to unite because people need to realize it boils down to a fight for human rights. And as it stands, atheists have a bad enough reputation as it is without burning bibles on YouTube and foul-mouth ranting. This will only further cripple any chance of a real atheist world-wide organization focused on the issues we need to address!

  6. Michael Dixon says:

    I often wonder if liberal Christians in america could stand together with atheists in a common push for true seperation of chuch and state. Because these Christians will never really lose thier right to worship freely in this country. The propaganda that religious americans are marginilized is a lie! Church-State seperation protects everyone.

  7. Atheists in Politics

    A new energy is sweeping American atheists, secular humanists, and freethinkers. More of us are coming forward, speaking out, and taking action to preserve our secular democracy. The backlash against years dominated by Christian extremism is underway…

  8. todd Katz says:

    If atheism is a movement it is a rebel with the wrong cause. You have picked the wrong bogeyman. Atheists should be focusing their resources and time on healing the sick, feeding the hungry and helping widows and orphans.You canot build a lasting movement based on shadowboxing with the beleivers in a supposedly nonexistant God.

  9. mortgage indianapolis says:

    Hi from New York And thanks for the web site. It was just the thing I had been looking for. It has helped me no end. Thanks again

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

%d bloggers like this: